PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180510 |
Uptime | 1.8 Days |
Run Date | Apr 02 '23 at 08:38 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD0240S00 240GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 83 8.2 90 16 7.9 MB/s
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
191GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 62 61 63 63 MB/s
|
51.9%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
445GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 83 10 96 17 8.7 MB/s
|
51.3%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD5000KS-00MNB0 500GB
184GB free
Firmware: 07.02E07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 62 61 63 63 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB M378B5773CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 688x |
Core i7-2600Intel $199Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 600x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 318x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 143x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 87x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |