Acer Aspire E1-422

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-422  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E1-422
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130710
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 07:23
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Memory 29.5
1-Core 28
2-Core 57.1
23% 38.2 Pts
4-Core 86.2
8-Core 93.4
12% 89.8 Pts
64-Core 91.7
6% 91.7 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Acer(1025 0767) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.7 11 12 11 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 499
Write 9.5
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 10.5
28% 135 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.3
116% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 92%
Colorful SL500 250GB
98GB free
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 2.9 1.2 1.3 1.1 1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.8
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 258
16% 258 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-422 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-422

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback