Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '23 at 00:17
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 168
2-Core 337
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 975
99% 804 Pts
64-Core 1,047
65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN8868 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1876 600 169 154 126 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,435
Write 1,938
Mixed 1,562
SusWrite 508
307% 1,361 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 58.7
194% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 49.1
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 73.2
68% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 154%
Great: 520%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
91GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 320 270 338 358 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 143
Write 65.2
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 324
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 9.4
41% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 8.9
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 10.2
8% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 100%
3 51 2GB SSD
204GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 5.3 214 3.4 72 3.3 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 118
Write 111
Mixed 298
SusWrite 85.4
35% 153 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 9.8
70% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 10.7
14% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 76%
3 512GB SSD 512GB
188GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 421 424 425 414 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 417
Write 184
Mixed 359
SusWrite 421
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 11.2
97% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 86.6
DQ Mixed 12.8
23% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 126 125 127 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
63% Good
Read 93.2
Write 55.9
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 126
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
456GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 149 150 146 151 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 103
Mixed 38
SusWrite 146
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 320GB
229GB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 34.7
Write 40.8
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 41
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL18-22-22 D4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 37.5
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 38.5
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $482
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback