Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 23:20
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 168
2-Core 339
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 992
102% 823 Pts
64-Core 1,106
68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN8868 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1926 577 290 300 246 215 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,434
Write 1,923
Mixed 1,681
SusWrite 592
318% 1,407 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 67.1
223% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1081
DQ Write 739
DQ Mixed 563
514% 794 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 203%
Great: 520%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
91GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 217 199 209 275 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.8% Above average
Read 277
Write 152
Mixed 199
SusWrite 233
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 24.1
96% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 47.5
DQ Write 50.6
DQ Mixed 45.3
35% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 100%
3 51 2GB SSD
204GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 385 382 383 260 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 291
Write 389
Mixed 308
SusWrite 299
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 9.1
55% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 15.2
50% 109 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 76%
3 512GB SSD 512GB
188GB free
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 429 420 429 420 428 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 486
Write 394
Mixed 360
SusWrite 426
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 12.7
119% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 15.5
69% 150 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 82 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 137
Write 148
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 81.1
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
456GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 146 149 147 150 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 124
Mixed 38
SusWrite 145
89% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
167% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 320GB
229GB free
Firmware: 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 39.5
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 40.6
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL18-22-22 D4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 38.8
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 32.3
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 39.7
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II Builds (Compare 2,264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $502
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback