Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 16:22
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 68
2-Core 116
49% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 167
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 12.1
12% 14.7 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 8.4
10% 13.3 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 726
Write 549
Mixed 669
144% 648 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 26.9
91% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 92.7
DQ Mixed 170
122% 160 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 236%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
18GB free, PID 385a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23
Write 5
Mixed 13.3
15% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905700-072.A01G 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 20
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 20
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 11.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback