Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 18:01
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 251
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 472
55% 425 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.7% Poor
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 43.3
Parallax 24.8
25% 32.9 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 21.6
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,251
Write 982
Mixed 1,019
241% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 43.9
134% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 327
240% 321 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 236%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
18GB free, PID 385a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.9
Write 5
Mixed 13.2
14% 13 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 33.1
Write 2.7
Mixed 2.7
10% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.95 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905700-072.A01G 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 19.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 16
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback