MSI MS-16R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF63 8RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16R1  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 11:05
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 55
1-Core 118
2-Core 224
70% 132 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 374
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 123C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 34.5
24% 34.1 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 25.5
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 163 136 138 136 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 558
Write 367
Mixed 420
SusWrite 178
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 23
84% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 166
131% 185 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 115%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
461GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 148 146 147 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 81.5
Write 136
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 143
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-053.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R1 Builds (Compare 1,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback