Positivo POS-EINM70CS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-EINM70CS  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EINM70CS
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 22:37
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1007U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 29.2
2-Core 43.4
31% 43.7 Pts
4-Core 50.7
8-Core 55.8
7% 53.2 Pts
64-Core 49
3% 49 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 2111) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03180000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 189 167 11 11 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 288
Write 333
Mixed 222
SusWrite 110
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 17.2
65% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 111
80% 105 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
282GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 96 95 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 59.4
Write 92.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 94.1
50% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 6.2
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-EINM70CS Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-EINM70CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback