MSI MPG Z590 GAMING PLUS (MS-7D07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D07
MotherboardMSI MPG Z590 GAMING PLUS (MS-7D07)  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 21:03
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$234
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 161
2-Core 323
105% 194 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 1,171
106% 894 Pts
64-Core 1,212
75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 207
Parallax 206
183% 213 fps
MRender 249
Gravity 153
Splatting 125
138% 176 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 154%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 725 866 880 890 890 780 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1318
Write 865
Mixed 819
SusWrite 838
214% 960 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 80
198% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 822
DQ Mixed 343
329% 499 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 194%
Great: 209%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
445GB free
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3629 3926 3931 3908 3891 1236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
531% Outstanding
Read 3,861
Write 3,672
Mixed 2,517
SusWrite 3,420
757% 3,367 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 94.2
298% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,870
DQ Write 1,456
DQ Mixed 1,660
1,243% 1,662 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 531%
Great: 537%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
201GB free
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1368 370 379 372 372 379 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 1,696
Mixed 1,376
SusWrite 540
285% 1,269 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 73.5
263% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,307
DQ Write 1,339
DQ Mixed 1,372
1,018% 1,339 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 231%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP3600D4V64L17/16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 45.2
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.9
SC Write 44.7
SC Mixed 36.6
105% 36.7 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 280 27" 1280 720 AUS278F VG279QM
Typical MPG Z590 GAMING PLUS (MS-7D07) Builds (Compare 3,657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z590 GAMING PLUS (MS-7D07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $901
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback