bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH77KC
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 20:45
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 177
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 297
36% 276 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.3.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.9% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 59
Parallax 75.7
45% 63.5 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 43.1
44% 55 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 49%
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Intel(8086 2031) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 390
Write 321
Mixed 51.6
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 0.9
46% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 15.5
30% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 91%
Kingston SSDNOW 30GB
22GB free
Firmware: AJXA0202
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 139
Write 51.9
Mixed 65.9
19% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 9.6
40% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 7.7
DQ Write 25.4
DQ Mixed 11.7
10% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 23%
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33
39GB free
Firmware: 3.ADH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 19 22 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 102
Write 26.5
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 21.8
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 41%
Apacer AC203 500GB
146GB free, PID c002
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 38 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 50.1
Write 36.1
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 36.9
49% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-2GBNS Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 04CD F3-10666CL9-2GBNS Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback