Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 93.7 1-Core 94.2 2-Core 232 79% 140 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 627 66% 531 Pts	64-Core 762 47% 762 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 86%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 240GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 612 611 609 605 598 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,250 Write 1,439 Mixed 648 SusWrite 637 223% 994 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 66 4K Mixed 42.4 142% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 670 DQ Write 485 DQ Mixed 579 432% 578 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 254%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4S240FSD.M16FAD 2x8GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 24.7 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 25.8 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	643x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	455x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	330x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	225x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GBWDCBench 139%, 2,393 samples	118x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	52x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	303x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	88x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	84x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16