Gigabyte GA-P64V7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P64V7  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170728
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 31 '23 at 09:09
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 179
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 526
53% 430 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 3464) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3129
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 58.3
45% 60.5 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 59.8
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$92
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 1369 1204 1042 702 662 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,662
Write 1,490
Mixed 1,439
SusWrite 1,042
316% 1,408 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 49.6
162% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 553
401% 527 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 204%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P64V7 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P64V7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback