Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170220
Uptime	12.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '23 at 02:51
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 195 67% 121 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 634 61% 500 Pts	64-Core 989 61% 989 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.7% Poor	Lighting 32.8 Reflection 38.7 Parallax 34.7 27% 35.4 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 26.1 26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 233 122 118 114 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 460 Mixed 388 SusWrite 192 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 77.2 4K Mixed 49.3 160% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 363 273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 131%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 80GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 0 0 109 341 194 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 473 Mixed 390 SusWrite 172 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 81 4K Mixed 51.6 169% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 87.3 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 67.4 96% 169 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 131%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 141GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 136 145 146 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 134 Write 135 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 140 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2400C DDR4 4x16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 25.4 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 24 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $852

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16