Gigabyte GA-B150M-EVO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B150M-EVO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150M-EVO-CF  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 10:27
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 114
43% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 172
25% 181 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Device(7333 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 28.1
19% 26.5 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 24.4
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SU650 480GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 370 351 395 383 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 348
Write 300
Mixed 294
SusWrite 367
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 14.2
49% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 44.7
78% 150 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
379GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 162 154 162 150 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 88.6
Write 153
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 156
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
88% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B150M-EVO-CF Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-EVO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $708
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback