TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H97M-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150920
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 23:47
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 182
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 539
55% 444 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 77%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
MSI(1462 3750)
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.2% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 97.2
Parallax 88.4
80% 94.6 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 92.2
Splatting 78.3
72% 89 fps
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 77.2%
 Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 230 30 56 13 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 462
Write 394
Mixed 381
SusWrite 73.7
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.3
44% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 34.6%
 Great: 100%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
791GB free
Firmware: RDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 84
Write 109
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 62.3
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
196% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 42.4%
 Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
413GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 154 165 166 166 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 101
Write 97
Mixed 64
SusWrite 159
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 74.7%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5584-010.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 35.4%
 Great: 35%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H97M-DS3P Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-DS3P

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples23x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples22x
Core i5-4440Intel  $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples7x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples33x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia  $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples5x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples5x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples6x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung  $68Bench 104%, 60,851 samples6x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples5x
RAM
99P5471-067.A00LF 0420 16GBKingstonBench 28%, 5 samples5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples5x
Kingston 99P5471-067.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 56%, 5 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback