Asus ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 129%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive394% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '23 at 03:51
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$464
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 229
2-Core 462
132% 258 Pts
4-Core 925
8-Core 1,737
159% 1,331 Pts
64-Core 4,275
265% 4,275 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 129%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 119
Parallax 12.5
9% 47.5 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 4.5
5% 6.87 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GDC7102Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1990 2008 2037 2011 2022 1879 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
394% Outstanding
Read 2,073
Write 2,051
Mixed 1,964
SusWrite 1,991
456% 2,020 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 280
4K Mixed 95.8
334% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 2,166
DQ Write 1,706
DQ Mixed 1,945
1,453% 1,939 MB/s
Poor: 304%
This bench: 394%
Great: 410%
Samsung MZQL27T6HBLA-00A07 7.5TB
4TB free
Firmware: GDC5502Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3359 3330 3317 3275 3333 3354 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
503% Outstanding
Read 2,553
Write 3255
Mixed 2,389
SusWrite 3328
652% 2,881 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 290
4K Mixed 87.7
343% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 2,332
DQ Write 1,867
DQ Mixed 2,100
1,572% 2,100 MB/s
Poor: 396%
This bench: 503%
Great: 503%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 7.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 570 581 566 570 538 511 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
111% Outstanding
Read 532
Write 421
Mixed 448
SusWrite 556
110% 489 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 28.3
101% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 845
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 425
350% 516 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 16TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 27 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 23.2
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 27
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 3.4
982% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 152%
Great: 217%
LSI MR9260-8i 17.5TB
16.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 63 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
157% Outstanding
MC Read 57.5
MC Write 63.7
MC Mixed 60.9
173% 60.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 33.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 157%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 1,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback