MSI B85M-E43 DASH (MS-7830)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7830
MotherboardMSI B85M-E43 DASH (MS-7830)  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '23 at 17:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 360
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 470
Asus(1043 0533) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.7% Below average
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 57.2
Parallax 65.3
30% 53.3 fps
MRender 57.5
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 41.4
40% 49.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 056
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 222
Write 204
Mixed 14.2
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 0.3
30% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 26.6
30% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
525GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 173 173 174 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 137
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 173
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
DDR3 1600 8G Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E43 DASH (MS-7830) Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI B85M-E43 DASH (MS-7830)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback