Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '23 at 08:47
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 22.7
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 183
48% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 310
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.56% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.8
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 9.8
6% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 74 127 48 65 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 306
Write 209
Mixed 229
SusWrite 80.1
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 19.6
78% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 41
55% 103 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
445GB free
Firmware: 0005SDM1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5086
Mixed 89
1,854% 2,588 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ronisys NB 8G 1600 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 3.9
13% 4.43 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 302
13% 302 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback