Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Memory 39.8 1-Core 26.7 2-Core 42.8 24% 36.4 Pts	4-Core 55.9 8-Core 61.5 8% 58.7 Pts	64-Core 53.9 3% 53.9 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1BF2) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 1.9 1% 2 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 512GB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.4.1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 181 169 184 143 169 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.9% Below average	Read 145 Write 147 Mixed 136 SusWrite 170 34% 149 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 14.3 48% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 71.9 DQ Mixed 88.2 65% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 0443 RMT3020EC58E9F1333 8GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 7.8 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 203 20% 203 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	82x
Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)ATIBench 1%, 62 samples	1x

RAM
AD73I1B1672EG 2x2GBAdataBench 25%, 997 samples	9x
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 753 samples	8x
HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GBHynixBench 24%, 1,873 samples	6x

Value: 40% - Below average

Total price: $227

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16