Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 19:59
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 195
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 710
64% 542 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.6% Average
Lighting 48
Reflection 60.7
Parallax 70.6
39% 59.8 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 45.7
44% 54.2 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Saichi D500 2280 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1021B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 404 405 415 414 424 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 466
Write 416
Mixed 400
SusWrite 404
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 16.9
98% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 25.8
67% 137 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Kingchuxing 1TB 1TB
750GB free
Firmware: V0919A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 225 226 234 234 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63% Good
Read 245
Write 221
Mixed 229
SusWrite 230
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 24
103% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 53.8
76% 140 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10F/8 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 18.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback