HP 700-010xt

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 700-010xt  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory25.1 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 16:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 457
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.3% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 36.4
28% 36.2 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 25.8
26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate SSD 250GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST8S1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 200 237 245 245 245 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.1% Good
Read 256
Write 242
Mixed 232
SusWrite 219
54% 237 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 29.1
98% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 155
129% 185 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
733GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 172 172 172 174 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 134
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 172
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G16002 8502 PSD38G16002 8502 PSD38G16002 28GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-010xt Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP 700-010xt

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $356
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback