Lenovo 11QC0028PB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 11QC0028PB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 31A0
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211201
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 11:16
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 38.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 284
76% 154 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 823
87% 693 Pts
64-Core 958
59% 958 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Legend(17AA 31A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 7.7
5% 8.97 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 8.4
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MEE1OWX 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.2Q0628
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,213
Write 726
Mixed 24.4
142% 654 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 40.2
118% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 607
DQ Write 819
DQ Mixed 493
434% 640 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 5.6
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback