Asus K53SV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K53SV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SV
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '17 at 19:45
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 106
56% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 180
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Asus(1043 15F2) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8792
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 1.81
3% 3.43 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3
3% 4.35 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 256GB-$194
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN263 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 488
Write 208
Mixed 271
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 10.9
58% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 35.6
58% 113 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SV Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback