Asus GL703VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAsus GL703VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL703VD
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180815
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 14:15
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 165
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 442
45% 363 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1BC0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 31.8
25% 30.9 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 20.3
23% 29 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 262 302 227 580 527 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 993
Write 973
Mixed 124
SusWrite 411
139% 625 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 38.4
115% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 218
202% 319 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 118%
Great: 277%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
709GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 63 64 67 73 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 859B BL8G26C16S4B.8FD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 13.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL703VD Builds (Compare 518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL703VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback