MSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150420
Uptime8 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 10:38
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 51.3
2-Core 98.5
48% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 289
30% 240 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 37.3
31% 38.1 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 38
Splatting 27.4
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 280
Write 257
Mixed 236
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 35.3
114% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 38.2
DQ Write 93.8
DQ Mixed 50
43% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 98%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
497GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 102 105 105 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49% Average
Read 65.6
Write 70
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 104
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
174% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C7-8GTX F3-1600C7-8GTX 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.2
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GMA-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback