Asus PRIME A520M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-E  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 06:22
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 308
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 876
86% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Lighting 91.5
Reflection 140
Parallax 177
75% 136 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 93.9
Splatting 164
126% 154 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GC128 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 121 92 124 91 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 401
Write 223
Mixed 214
SusWrite 110
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 27
125% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 33.6
DQ Mixed 113
74% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
232GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 98 99 101 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 99
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 34.4
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 32.5
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A520M-E Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback