Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory15.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 21:46
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 183
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 444
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
AMD Radeon R7 350X
Dell(1028 0081) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
6.88% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 13.9
7% 11 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 8.2
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.88%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 365 382 378 388 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 454
Write 388
Mixed 393
SusWrite 369
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 28.7
99% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 142
115% 167 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 125%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 111 110 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 119
Write 79.4
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 111
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
202% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 76%
WD easystore 25FB 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 55.1
Write 25.2
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 27.2
40% 33 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.9
56% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 859B BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback