Asrock B75 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 20:16
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 154
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 270
33% 252 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1790 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 8.8
37% 31.4 fps
MRender 57.5
Gravity 56.6
Splatting 45
43% 53 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
524GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 190 77 79 77 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 365
Write 283
Mixed 271
SusWrite 125
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 24
71% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 354
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback