Today's hottest deals

Asrock B75 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 12:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 150
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 272
33% 251 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 53.3
34% 44.3 fps
MRender 54.6
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 40.6
39% 48.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$99
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 65 67 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.4% Below average
Read 248
Write 60.3
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 65.2
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 13.7
45% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 92.5
76% 111 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 16.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback