Hp-pavilion NQ889AA-ABU p6047uk

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Hp-pavilion NQ889AA-ABU p6047uk (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '23 at 15:15
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 56.4 1-Core 36.8 2-Core 73.4 36% 55.5 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 136 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 401A) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.41 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.5% Above average	Lighting 75 Reflection 75.2 Parallax 72.7 61% 74.3 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 73 Splatting 60 53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 183 211 218 235 237 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.6% Above average	Read 241 Write 229 Mixed 186 SusWrite 203 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 26.3 88% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 181 136% 182 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NQ889AA-ABU p6047uk Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion NQ889AA-ABU p6047uk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	13x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	1x

SSD
Vertex 4 128GBOCZ $215Bench 88%, 19,372 samples	12x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 16% - Very poor

Total price: $264

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16