HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 9470m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151022
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '23 at 23:10
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3427U 4,182 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 64.7 2-Core 116 49% 81.9 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 154 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18DF) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.96% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.7 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.4 3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.96% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 240GB 4,398 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1029A SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 248 112 116 119 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 421 Write 384 Mixed 301 SusWrite 172 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 19.2 91% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 35.7 59% 113 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 91%
Generic SS16G SD Card 16GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 14GB free Firmware: 8.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.5 4 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 50.2 Write 4.7 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 4.2 12% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Mixed 0 1,912% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 16%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 970GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 882GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 130 134 130 130 134 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.9% Very good	Read 118 Write 92.4 Mixed 78.4 SusWrite 132 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 72%
ASMT 2235 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 27GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 37 34 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 52.8 Write 36.9 Mixed 36 SusWrite 35.9 52% 40.4 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 9.7 562% 9.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173CB0-YK0 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.6 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 12.8 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

CPU
Core i5-3437UIntelBench 49%, 3,817 samples	339x
Core i5-3427UIntelBench 49%, 4,182 samples	313x
Core i7-3687UIntelBench 53%, 2,933 samples	171x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	954x
Ivy 4PhdgdBench 4%, 153 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	65x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	41x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	27x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	28x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	25x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369