Fujitsu CELSIUS H5511

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS H5511  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB77
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 15:13
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 251
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 645
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 673
42% 673 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1E26 004F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 27
19% 25.2 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 20
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TB
780GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7402Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1082 1183 1092 1422 1376 1386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,544
Write 1289
Mixed 1,343
SusWrite 1,257
306% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 65
207% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 538
382% 499 MB/s
Poor: 230%
This bench: 225%
Great: 442%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS H5511 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H5511

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback