Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 96.2 2-Core 188 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 351 46% 345 Pts	64-Core 343 21% 343 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Elitegroup(1019 1028) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.37 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 21.1 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 22 17% 20.3 fps	MRender 24.3 Gravity 22.8 Splatting 16.4 17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 400 Write 381 Mixed 368 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 41.8 135% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 324 245% 329 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 168 169 169 170 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 97.1 Write 72.4 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 168 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GB 1,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.5 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 80.9 50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x

SSD
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	1x

RAM
M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 16GBUnknownBench 55%, 25 samples	1x
M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 28%, 1,807 samples	1x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $280