Dell Inspiron 7720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Inspiron 7720  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 04M3YM
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150519
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 14:13
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 165
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 375
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 0578) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 2.8
3% 5.3 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 218 207 229 236 232 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 453
Mixed 356
SusWrite 245
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 41.2
140% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 284
233% 333 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 117%
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100
112GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 148 152 138 143 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 185
Write 163
Mixed 197
SusWrite 140
39% 171 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 27.7
96% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 139
112% 160 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 81%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 2AR20003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 110 109 109 111 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 116
Write 44.6
Mixed 60
SusWrite 108
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5,684
Mixed 67.7
2,058% 2,876 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 2 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 64%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power4G 4GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.2 4.2 3.9 4.2 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 302
Write 2.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.2
54% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Mixed 0
254% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-072.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 7720 Builds (Compare 489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 7720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback