Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 23:40
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 160
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 381
44% 342 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
HP(103C 6617) 3GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 30
Parallax 45.2
29% 36.9 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 20.2
22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 123 118 127 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39% Below average
Read 280
Write 126
Mixed 194
SusWrite 117
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 13.2
63% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 61.2
DQ Mixed 15.3
19% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 39%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 103 108 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 118
Write 113
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 106
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 69%
JMicron Generic 160GB
66GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 70 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 84.3
Write 92.7
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 71.2
97% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.9% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $376
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback