Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150602
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 22:36
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 93
2-Core 157
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 225
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 8664) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 62.8
48% 63 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 58.1
Splatting 52.3
48% 59 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 71 35 63 93 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 49.5
Write 102
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 61.6
13% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 21.9
83% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 72.9
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 9.5
31% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 95%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
244GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 214 212 213 210 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 352
Write 361
Mixed 240
SusWrite 214
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 22.9
80% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 144
111% 151 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 93%
WD My Book 1130 3TB
109GB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 70 67 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 55.7
Write 60.4
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 67.8
83% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 14
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback