CDM Q170I-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCDM Q170I-PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q170I-PLUS
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161013
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 18:32
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 90
2-Core 191
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 300
43% 315 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
MSI(1462 3822) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.8% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 108
55% 79.7 fps
MRender 54
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 39
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM10.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 61 85 68 55 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 466
Write 389
Mixed 340
SusWrite 77.2
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 24.9
115% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 42.7
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 179
123% 146 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 10 27 131 142 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 201
Write 3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 76.5
51% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Mixed 0
275% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU7AFR8N-TF Samsung M391A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 25
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q170I-PLUS Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: CDM Q170I-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback