Gigabyte GA-H310M D2VX SI 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M D2VX SI 2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180920
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 16:30
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MMR-User
Background CPU 72%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 154
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 500
49% 401 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 8730) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 110
Parallax 124
97% 118 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 115
Splatting 106
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 210 26 5.9 71 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 494
Write 416
Mixed 400
SusWrite 75.8
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 9.77 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
784GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 174 165 176 178 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 142
Write 134
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 173
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TLD48G26P70 Transcend JM2666HLB-8G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 22.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 12.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M D2VX SI 2.0 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M D2VX SI 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback