HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory41.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 21:38
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 185
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 706
63% 534 Pts
64-Core 1,753
108% 1,753 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 73.3
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 99.3
60% 81 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 85
Splatting 50.6
55% 69.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 392 397 400 399 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 432
Write 422
Mixed 381
SusWrite 399
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 26.7
86% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 276
207% 277 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 125%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
878GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1703 1646 1636 1679 1676 1674 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,593
Write 1,731
Mixed 1,691
SusWrite 1,669
378% 1,671 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 39.7
129% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 361
266% 353 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 221%
Great: 394%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
101GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 81 81 82 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 109
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 82.3
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
8GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 86 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 117
Write 34.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 84.5
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-YH9 6x8GB
6 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 24
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.1
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback