PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ (all builds) |
Memory | 2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140424 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 28 '17 at 01:48 |
Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
|
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
54.8%
Above average
|
|||
60.9%
Good
|
||||
HGST TOURO Mobile 500GB
94GB free, PID 1024
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 9905595-010.A00LF 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 4x |
A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 53%, 1,723 samples | 3x |
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 3x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 3x |
R7 360AMD $100Bench 18%, 26,726 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |