PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 33.3 GB free of 40.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840x2160x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100225 |
Uptime | 2.9 Days |
Run Date | Mar 21 '23 at 20:49 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5540
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
62.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
80.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 213 219 173 228 231 MB/s
|
55.6%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST1000NM0001 1TB
621GB free
Firmware: PS07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
878GB free
Firmware: CC56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 148 150 149 151 MB/s
|
87.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Hitachi HUS723030ALS640 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: M2D4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 42 42 42 MB/s
|
58.8%
Above average
|
|||
ASMT 2115 320GB
135GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 189x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 68x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |