Asus A_F_K20BF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus A_F_K20BF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A_F_K20BF
Memory1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '17 at 00:46
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 89.1
49% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 186
21% 167 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 5.17
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 4.97
4% 6.1 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 8.17
5% 5.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 95
Mixed 111
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.17
66% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LFU1KBG/2G ASU16D3LU1MNG/4G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.4% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_F_K20BF Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus A_F_K20BF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback