MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 285%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics276% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D52
MotherboardMSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 15:58
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 182
2-Core 358
109% 207 Pts
4-Core 698
8-Core 1230
116% 964 Pts
64-Core 2,358
146% 2,358 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
276% Outstanding
Lighting 400
Reflection 569
Parallax 385
326% 451 fps
MRender 546
Gravity 369
Splatting 264
307% 393 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 276%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2438 982 977 992 999 996 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,972
Write 3,229
Mixed 2953
SusWrite 1,231
584% 2,596 MB/s
4K Read 80.5
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 105
343% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,362
DQ Write 947
DQ Mixed 1,096
834% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 352%
Great: 442%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
459GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1601 1704 1599 1390 1414 1430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,557
Write 1,806
Mixed 1,750
SusWrite 1523
427% 1,909 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 89.8
298% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,428
DQ Write 997
DQ Mixed 1,158
880% 1,194 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 342%
Great: 410%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 614900WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3651 3828 3834 3830 1855 1046 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
487% Outstanding
Read 3,721
Write 3,364
Mixed 2,966
SusWrite 3,007
734% 3,265 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 87.4
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,592
DQ Write 1,085
DQ Mixed 1,313
987% 1,330 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 487%
Great: 578%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
250GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 431 429 430 431 431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 429
Mixed 313
SusWrite 429
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 39.8
137% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 164
126% 168 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 162 160 174 142 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 132
Write 146
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 155
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 106%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.7 7 7 7 7.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 106
Write 7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.8
25% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Mixed 0
143% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB-$85
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 64.8
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 36
128% 45 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 33.5
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52) Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $917
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback