MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 255%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 294%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics248% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D52
MotherboardMSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220518
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '23 at 14:44
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 180
2-Core 359
108% 206 Pts
4-Core 697
8-Core 1,369
122% 1,033 Pts
64-Core 2,358
146% 2,358 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
248% Outstanding
Lighting 334
Reflection 516
Parallax 353
272% 401 fps
MRender 548
Gravity 372
Splatting 267
309% 396 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 248%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2711 1049 989 987 982 988 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,924
Write 3,214
Mixed 2965
SusWrite 1,284
584% 2,597 MB/s
4K Read 79.7
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 103
338% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,362
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 1105
838% 1,137 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 352%
Great: 442%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
459GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1573 1789 1628 1433 1434 1435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,560
Write 1,787
Mixed 1,737
SusWrite 1549
427% 1,908 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 90.1
296% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,438
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 1,168
887% 1,204 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 344%
Great: 410%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 614900WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3571 3824 3826 3098 1149 1173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
477% Outstanding
Read 3,817
Write 3,173
Mixed 2,945
SusWrite 2,774
713% 3,177 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 86.5
308% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,604
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 1,353
1,013% 1,360 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 477%
Great: 578%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
250GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 437 438 437 435 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 399
Write 375
Mixed 315
SusWrite 433
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 36.7
131% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 163
126% 170 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 167 182 174 158 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 135
Write 153
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 167
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB-$85
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 35.9
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 34.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52) Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,027
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback