Asus M2A-VM HDMI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2A-VM HDMI  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090205
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 14:40
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 33.7
32% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 27.1
8-Core 65.3
5% 46.2 Pts
64-Core 63.7
4% 63.7 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 91 83 78 76 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 116
Write 127
Mixed 127
SusWrite 84.5
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 18.5
58% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 53.4
DQ Mixed 33.3
28% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 125%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129
780GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 87 79 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 132
Write 120
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 83.5
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.6
288% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 97%
WD WD3200JB-00KFA0 320GB
38GB free
Firmware: 08.05J08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 39 42 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 54.1
Write 36.3
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 41
30% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 35%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
57GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 86 80 82 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 85
Mixed 55
SusWrite 83.8
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52%
Great: 100%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$145
85GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 95 88 95 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 99.4
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 93
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2A-VM HDMI Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2A-VM HDMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $38
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback