MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 10:59
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 225
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 370
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 75.3
40% 61.2 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 55.1
Splatting 44.3
42% 52.8 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37240G 480GB
242GB free
Firmware: SBFKP1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 420 354 190 184 189 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 467
Write 449
Mixed 362
SusWrite 286
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 41.1
154% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 232
204% 301 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 78%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 91 126 64 76 90 MB/s
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 140
Write 80.9
Mixed 124
SusWrite 80.7
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 35.6
125% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 42.2
83% 166 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-4GB-2666 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 29.6
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 26.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback