Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200318
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 10:46
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 171
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 359
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel(8086 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 5.6
4% 4.97 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 7.2
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P10C 512GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0828A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 461 244 43 42 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,748
Write 1,119
Mixed 1,067
SusWrite 269
233% 1,051 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 27.3
149% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 605
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 490
379% 521 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 154%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5700-017.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,752 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback