TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory3.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190805
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 05:38
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 199
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 560
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 76.5%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1264) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 6.8
5% 14.7 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 10.1
7% 7.77 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.74%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SNV2S10 1TB
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI02102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1219 1310 1224 1274 684 707 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 2,016
Write 1,552
Mixed 1,364
SusWrite 1,070
336% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 37.4
148% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 416
342% 497 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑
This bench: 215%
 Great: 297%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 108 108 106 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 96.4
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 107
126% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
174% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 50.3%
 Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.4% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 15.1
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 17.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 53.4%
 Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-52 Builds (Compare 5,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-52

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples3,750x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples1,737x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples2,911x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples1,513x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples687x
SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples832x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples255x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples196x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples603x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples411x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples279x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback