Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 6,024 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 196 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 454 48% 382 Pts	64-Core 459 28% 459 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000M 731 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Legend(17AA 222F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1013 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.8% Below average	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 37.5 33% 45.6 fps	MRender 50.2 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 43 36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 37%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 17,176 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 449GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,361 Write 1871 Mixed 1,125 395% 1,786 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 59.8 200% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 810 DQ Write 636 DQ Mixed 701 530% 716 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$265 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 423 Write 406 Mixed 399 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 95.3 4K Mixed 57.3 188% 65.1 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 334 250% 334 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 135%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 259GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 440 Write 400 Mixed 384 91% 408 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 98 4K Mixed 56.2 189% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 333 249% 332 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
General UDisk 8GB 7,759 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID null, Eastfun Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 26.2 Write 13.7 Mixed 6.7 17% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 43% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB M471A2K43BB1-CPB M471A2K43CB1-CRC M471A2K43BB1-CPB 64GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.5% Very good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 22.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 22.4 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000MNvidiaBench 34%, 731 samples	10x
Quadro M5000MNvidiaBench 38%, 654 samples	9x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	9x

SSD
MZVKV512HAJH-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 207%, 1,391 samples	6x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 242%, 17,176 samples	5x
MZSLW1T0HMLH-000L1 1TBSamsungBench 168%, 587 samples	4x

RAM
M474A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 74%, 358 samples	9x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 4x8GBHynixBench 72%, 573 samples	3x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,393 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16