Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 6,024 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 122 55% 89.6 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 334 33% 272 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000M 731 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Legend(17AA 222F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1013 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.1% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 57.6 Parallax 36.8 32% 44.5 fps	MRender 48.8 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 42.4 35% 43.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 17,176 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 450GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1006 1108 1248 1238 1297 1186 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	174% Outstanding	Read 1,173 Write 1,150 Mixed 784 SusWrite 1,180 241% 1,072 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 41.3 130% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 311 239% 326 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 296 323 322 340 350 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Read 429 Write 430 Mixed 396 SusWrite 316 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 29.7 104% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 238 182% 249 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 135%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 259GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 295 321 306 304 297 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 432 Write 438 Mixed 399 SusWrite 298 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 45.3 142% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 345 263% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB M471A2K43BB1-CPB M471A2K43CB1-CRC M471A2K43BB1-CPB 64GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	65.8% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 21.7 68% 24 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 18.2 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000MNvidiaBench 34%, 731 samples	10x
Quadro M5000MNvidiaBench 38%, 654 samples	9x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	9x

SSD
MZVKV512HAJH-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 207%, 1,391 samples	6x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 242%, 17,176 samples	5x
MZSLW1T0HMLH-000L1 1TBSamsungBench 168%, 587 samples	4x

RAM
M474A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 74%, 358 samples	9x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 4x8GBHynixBench 72%, 573 samples	3x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,393 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16